<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call for Copy: Issue 17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themonadreader.wordpress.com/2010/07/14/call-for-copy-issue-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themonadreader.wordpress.com/2010/07/14/call-for-copy-issue-17/</link>
	<description>Binding your input since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:07:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://themonadreader.wordpress.com/2010/07/14/call-for-copy-issue-17/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 03:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themonadreader.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Style manuals are quite a bit more diverse than you might think, especially when you compare US vs European styles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Style manuals are quite a bit more diverse than you might think, especially when you compare US vs European styles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://themonadreader.wordpress.com/2010/07/14/call-for-copy-issue-17/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themonadreader.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not that important and you may well consider this comment SPAM... I was just wondering, why the guidelines recommend practice that directly contradicts style manuals (at least the ones I know), like using an ndash with surrounding spaces instead of an &#039;unspaced&#039; mdash or never put a comma directly after &#039;e.g.&#039; and &#039;i.e.&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that important and you may well consider this comment SPAM&#8230; I was just wondering, why the guidelines recommend practice that directly contradicts style manuals (at least the ones I know), like using an ndash with surrounding spaces instead of an &#8216;unspaced&#8217; mdash or never put a comma directly after &#8216;e.g.&#8217; and &#8216;i.e.&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
